Models
Ornith-1.0-9B
The mid-size sweet spot for agentic coding: 2.40× mean at ~59–68 tok/s, and the first target here above 2× on chat.
- Made by
- DeepReinforce
- Size
- 9B
- Architecture
- Hybrid: linear + full attention
- Features
- Tool callingThinking
Run it
mlx-dspark serve --model mlx-community/Ornith-1.0-9B-8bit
Serves an OpenAI + Anthropic API on http://127.0.0.1:8080. For a one-off answer, use mlx-dspark generate --model mlx-community/Ornith-1.0-9B-8bit --prompt "…".
Drafter
stanleyphoong/Ornith-1.0-9B-DSparkresolves automatically with--mode auto(the default).
The drafter downloads with the model the first time you run it, and loads 4-bit quantized (acceptance doesn't depend on the drafter's precision).
Measured 2026-07-18 on an M4 Pro, 48 GB with mlx 0.32.0. This predates the September 2026 verify kernels, which raised every 8-bit model re-measured since, so it is probably conservative.
Ornith-1.0-9B is an agentic-coding model on the Qwen3.5-style hybrid backbone. Its community drafter by stanleyphoong was rigorously qualified by its author (17 of 17 gates, 95% of the DSpark paper's reference acceptance), and it produces the best chat speedups in the table.
Good to know#
- Acceptance on tool-call JSON is the highest this project has measured anywhere: 5.07 tokens per round in a Claude Code session.
- Copy-heavy editing: a rename refactor runs at 3.57× (93 tok/s) with lookup drafts.
- 4-bit trades ratio for speed: about 1.4–1.55× but 60–76 tok/s (plain baseline 49.3). Pick 4-bit for peak tok/s, 8-bit for quality and the headline ratio. The same drafter resolves for both.
- A bf16 target is slower in both ratio and absolute speed (1.54× on code at 22.9 tok/s). Don't bother.
- Tool calls use the XML
<function=…>form, translated to standard tool calls.
Numbers not matching your Mac? They shouldn't be identical: the draft cap is derived from your machine's measured curves. Run mlx-dspark benchmark --model mlx-community/Ornith-1.0-9B-8bit --trials 3 to get your own. See how these are measured.